I attended an arts industry event late
last year and was amazed to meet a publicist who didn't see social
media as part of their job. So, I wondered, should it be?
When I first started my career in arts
management, the typical publicity activities I undertook were writing
media releases, sending them to journalists and following up with
phone calls to gauge interest. And, in its most basic form, this is
still what the traditional publicist is doing today. Albeit on a much
bigger scale with bigger players and digital content rather than hard
copy.
Interestingly, publicity has often been
split off from other marketing functions in arts organisations. This,
in the past, has created silos where some publicists have become very
protective about their patch. So, I can almost understand why a
publicist wouldn't see social media as part of their role.
Personally, I see publicity as an
integral element of marketing and have never really understood why it
needs to be separate from the other marketing functions.
Now, the rise of social media is
increasingly blurring those lines between marketing and publicity and
demonstrating that there is a strong interdependence between the two.
Just this week it was reported that
London's West End audiences are up due to a number of successful
social media campaigns, despite average press reviews of the shows.
The campaigns were designed to build positive word of mouth and
encourage ticket purchases. Is that publicity or is that marketing? I
think it's both. And I would love to think that publicists are
embracing the opportunities that come with that.
No comments:
Post a Comment